Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
N
nettle
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Service Desk
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Operations
Operations
Incidents
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Brian Smith
nettle
Commits
982961a5
Commit
982961a5
authored
May 17, 2013
by
Niels Möller
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Fix rotation macros to portably support zero rotation count.
parent
23f108fb
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
9 additions
and
3 deletions
+9
-3
ChangeLog
ChangeLog
+4
-0
macros.h
macros.h
+5
-3
No files found.
ChangeLog
View file @
982961a5
2013-05-17 Niels Möller <nisse@lysator.liu.se>
* macros.h (ROTL32, ROTL64): Avoid undefined behaviour for zero
rotation count. Unfortunately makes CAST128 a bit slower with
gcc-4.6.3.
* ecc-j-to-a.c (ecc_j_to_a): Fixed ecc_modp_mul call, to avoid
invalid overlap of arguments to mpn_mul_n. Problem tracked down by
Magnus Holmgren.
...
...
macros.h
View file @
982961a5
...
...
@@ -141,9 +141,11 @@ do { \
(dst) += (blocksize), \
(src) += (blocksize)) )
#define ROTL32(n,x) (((x)<<(n)) | ((x)>>(32-(n))))
#define ROTL64(n,x) (((x)<<(n)) | ((x)>>(64-(n))))
/* The masking of the right shift is needed to allow n == 0 (using
just 32 - n and 64 - n results in undefined behaviour). */
#define ROTL32(n,x) (((x)<<(n)) | ((x)>>((-(n)&31))))
#define ROTL64(n,x) (((x)<<(n)) | ((x)>>((-(n))&63)))
/* Requires that size > 0 */
#define INCREMENT(size, ctr) \
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment