Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
N
nettle
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
GitLab community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Nettle
nettle
Commits
f68a96f4
Commit
f68a96f4
authored
Oct 16, 2005
by
Niels Möller
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Comment change.
Rev: src/nettle/sparc/aes-encrypt-internal.asm:1.11
parent
b396be2b
Branches
Branches containing commit
Tags
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
sparc/aes-encrypt-internal.asm
+4
-4
4 additions, 4 deletions
sparc/aes-encrypt-internal.asm
with
4 additions
and
4 deletions
sparc/aes-encrypt-internal.asm
+
4
−
4
View file @
f68a96f4
...
@@ -145,11 +145,11 @@ C 5: New assembler, with basic scheduling of AES_ROUND.
...
@@ -145,11 +145,11 @@ C 5: New assembler, with basic scheduling of AES_ROUND.
C
6
:
New
assembpler
,
with
loop
invariants
T0
-
T3.
C
6
:
New
assembpler
,
with
loop
invariants
T0
-
T3.
C
7
:
New
assembler
,
with
basic
scheduling
al
so
of
AES_FINAL_ROUND.
C
7
:
New
assembler
,
with
basic
scheduling
al
so
of
AES_FINAL_ROUND.
C
MB
/
s
cycles
/
bl
ock
C
MB
/
s
cycles
/
bl
ock
Code
si
ze
(
byte
s
)
C
1
1.2
1107
C
1
1.2
1107
592
C
2
2.3
572
C
2
2.3
572
1032
C
3
2.1
627
C
3
2.1
627
C
4
1.8
722
C
4
1.8
722
C
5
2.6
496
C
5
2.6
496
C
6
3.0
437
C
6
3.0
437
C
7
3.1
415
C
7
3.1
415
1448
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment